Disease Patterns

PPPD

Each section is layered for Foundation, Trainee, and Clinician readers — set your reading level in the sidebar.

Showing2of 3 sections·Trainee· 1 hidden

Signature on CDP

The figure below shows the archetypal PPPD pattern across the six SOT conditions, MCT response, and ADT adaptation, compared against an age-matched normal reference.

SOT pattern vs normal
PPPDage norm 700255075100EQS83C1EO ·F77C2EC ·F69C3EO ·F·Sw73C4EO ·Sw54C5EC ·Sw45C6EO ·Sw·Sw
MCT — medium-amplitude backward translation
platform129 ms-100-500+50+100COP mm0200400600800100012001400PPPD · backward · medium
ADT — sway energy across five trials per direction
sway energy025507510062T152T244T333T433T5Toes upadapting74T155T250T341T435T5Toes downadapting
Teaching point. PPPD is a clinical diagnosis (Bárány Society criteria); CDP supports rather than confirms. The classic supporting feature is visual preference (worse on C3/C6 than C2/C5), reflecting hyper-reliance on vision. MCT amplitudes may be exaggerated.

In this module

  1. PPPD overview (Bárány Society criteria)Foundation · Trainee · Clinician
  2. Supportive CDP findingsTrainee · Clinician
  3. PPPD vs aphysiologic patternClinician

PPPD overview (Bárány Society criteria)

Persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD) is defined by Bárány Society 2017 criteria as three months or more of dizziness, unsteadiness, or non-spinning vertigo present on most days, exacerbated by upright posture, active or passive motion, and complex visual stimuli. The disorder is often triggered by a prior acute vestibular event (neuritis, BPPV, even a panic attack), and persists by maladaptive postural-control strategies.

PPPD is a clinical diagnosis. CDP, audiometry, MRI, and the rest of the workup are supportive — they document the absence of organic disease that would otherwise explain the symptoms — but they don't make the diagnosis. The criteria are symptom-based.

The disorder is common. Vestibular clinics commonly identify PPPD in 10–30% of chronic-dizziness referrals, depending on case mix. Many patients have been investigated extensively before the diagnosis is recognised; CDP plays a useful role in providing objective evidence consistent with the clinical picture.

Supportive CDP findings

The supportive CDP findings for PPPD are visual preference (elevated PREF ratio) and over-scaled MCT amplitudes. Either or both may be present; neither is required for the diagnosis.

Visual preference is the more specific finding — a PREF ratio above 1.0 in a patient with three months of dizziness and a normal structural workup is highly suggestive. The mechanism is hyper-reliance on visual cues: when vision becomes misleading (sway-referenced surround), the patient cannot disengage from it and sways with the false visual signal.

Over-scaled MCT amplitudes reflect anxious hypersensitivity. The patient over-corrects to small perturbations, producing larger sway than the perturbation warrants. This is non-specific (it can occur in any anxious patient) but supports the PPPD picture when present alongside visual preference.

PPPD vs aphysiologic pattern

PPPD and aphysiologic patterns can co-exist, and distinguishing them requires care. PPPD is a clinical diagnosis with supportive CDP findings; aphysiologic patterns are CDP signatures that don't fit any physiologically-plausible disease. A patient can have both.

When the CDP shows clear visual preference plus over-scaling but no Cevette inversion, the picture fits PPPD without aphysiologic features. The patient is genuinely impaired by maladaptive postural control.

When the CDP shows a Cevette inversion or other aphysiologic features in addition to PPPD-supportive findings, the interpretation is more nuanced. Aphysiologic features can arise from extreme effort variability in anxious patients, or from a separate functional overlay. The clinical picture, the patient's effort during testing, and the consistency with other findings should drive interpretation rather than the CDP alone.