Clinical use

Clinical applications

CDP earns its keep across vestibular, neurological, geriatric, sports and occupational medicine. Each use-case has a characteristic CDP signature, a specific management decision the test informs, and a level of evidence.

Trainee

The strongest evidence base is in vestibular differential — Di Fabio's meta-analysis put CDP sensitivity for vestibular dysfunction at around 50–70% and specificity at 90–95%, making it useful as a confirmatory functional test when site-of-lesion tests (caloric, vHIT) are borderline.1,2 The rehabilitation-planning evidence is equally strong: baseline CDP profiles direct rehab focus, and CDP-tracked outcomes correlate with patient-reported dizziness-handicap.3,4

The fall-risk literature consistently identifies three predictors that independently associate with subsequent falls — composite score below age norm, hip-dominant strategy, and prolonged MCT latency. Combined, they identify older adults for targeted intervention.5,6

Application cards

Filter by domain to focus on a single area. Each card pairs the clinical question, the typical CDP pattern, the action it supports, and the evidence tier.

  • Peripheral vestibular

    Peripheral vestibular hypofunction

    established
    Question
    Is this patient's chronic imbalance attributable to a vestibular deficit when caloric or vHIT data are equivocal?
    Pattern
    Disproportionately reduced equilibrium scores on SOT conditions 5 and 6 (vestibular-only), preserved performance on 1–4.
    Action
    Supports the vestibular diagnosis when other tests are borderline; biases towards a targeted gaze-stabilisation and substitution VRT programme.
  • Peripheral vestibular

    Bilateral vestibulopathy

    established
    Question
    Does this patient with progressive imbalance and oscillopsia have bilateral vestibular loss?
    Pattern
    Severe drop in SOT 5/6 with falls; CDP composite score in the impaired range; surface and vision dependency together.
    Action
    Confirms functional impact; underpins the case for substitution training and prosthetic balance research enrolment.
  • Central nervous system

    Central CNS disease (Parkinson, MS, cerebellar)

    established
    Question
    Is the postural dyscontrol consistent with a central, rather than peripheral, lesion?
    Pattern
    Hip-strategy bias, abnormal MCT latencies, poor ADT adaptation, and direction-specific instability.
    Action
    Justifies neurology referral and targeted rehabilitation; longitudinal CDP tracks disease progression.
  • Rehabilitation

    Vestibular rehabilitation planning

    established
    Question
    Which sensory modality is this patient over-relying on, and what should the rehab focus on?
    Pattern
    Visual-dependency profile: poor on conditions 3 and 6 with relatively preserved 5 → optokinetic and visual-desensitisation work.
    Action
    Individualises VRT; baseline scores serve as the comparator at re-test.
  • Fall risk

    Fall-risk prediction in the elderly

    established
    Question
    Is this older adult at elevated risk of falling in the next 12 months?
    Pattern
    Composite SOT < age-norm, hip-dominant strategy, prolonged MCT latency.
    Action
    Triggers community-balance programme, home-modification review, deprescribing of sedatives.
  • Sports / concussion

    Sport-related concussion

    established
    Question
    Has this athlete's postural control returned to baseline before return-to-play?
    Pattern
    Persisting reduction in SOT composite vs pre-season baseline; abnormal MCT latencies after symptom resolution.
    Action
    Defers return-to-play; complements neurocognitive testing.
  • Functional / non-organic

    Functional / non-organic balance disorder

    emerging
    Question
    Are the sway patterns physiologically plausible, or do they suggest a functional component?
    Pattern
    Inconsistent patterns: better on harder conditions; excessive sway with eyes open and reduced sway with eyes closed.
    Action
    Supports a multidisciplinary referral including psychiatric / psychological assessment; never the sole basis for diagnosis.
  • Aerospace / occupational

    Aerospace and occupational medicine

    established
    Question
    Is the pilot, astronaut or soldier fit to return to duty after vestibular insult, fatigue or microgravity exposure?
    Pattern
    Quantified deviation from pre-deployment baseline; impaired adaptation on ADT post-spaceflight.
    Action
    Informs fitness-to-fly decisions, reconditioning timelines, and mission-design considerations.

What CDP does NOT do

  • Localises the lesion. CDP identifies the dysfunctional sensory system, not the anatomical site. Caloric, vHIT, VEMP and imaging do the localisation.
  • Replaces clinical examination. The history, the bedside exam, and audiogram remain the foundation. CDP is functional adjunct.
  • Diagnoses a functional disorder. Physiologically implausible patterns raise suspicion, but functional balance disorder needs multidisciplinary evaluation.
  • Replicates real-world settings. A booth is not a kitchen or a building site — for ecological validity, wearable IMUs are starting to fill the gap.