At the bedside
Differential diagnosis & HINTS
Two questions decide everything. First: is this central or peripheral? Then, if central: is it stroke or something slower? Both are answered mostly by the history and a careful oculomotor examination.
Central versus peripheral
The first fork is the highest-stakes one. A handful of features separate a benign peripheral vestibulopathy from a dangerous central lesion — no single one is decisive, but the pattern usually is.1
| Feature | Peripheral | Central |
|---|---|---|
| Nystagmus | Unidirectional, horizontal-torsional; suppressed by fixation | Vertical / torsional / direction-changing; fixation does not suppress |
| Head impulse test | Abnormal (catch-up saccade) on the affected side | Often normal — a red flag in acute vestibular syndrome |
| Skew deviation | Absent | May be present |
| Gait | Unsteady but able to walk | Often cannot stand or walk unaided |
| Hearing | May be affected (e.g. labyrinthitis, Ménière’s) | Usually spared — except AICA infarction |
| Other signs | None | Diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, weakness, numbness, Horner’s |
The HINTS interpreter
In a genuine acute vestibular syndrome, the three-step HINTS battery is more sensitive than early MRI for stroke.2,3 Set each finding below and read off the verdict. Remember the rule: any one central feature is enough to call the pattern dangerous.
HINTS interpreter
for a true acute vestibular syndromeAbnormal head impulse + unidirectional nystagmus + no skew is the benign peripheral triad, consistent with vestibular neuritis — but only when a true AVS is present and there are no other red flags.
The reassuring peripheral triad — abnormal head impulse, unidirectional nystagmus, no skew — is only valid when there is a true continuous AVS with spontaneous nystagmus. HINTS does not apply to episodic or positional vertigo, and a benign pattern never overrides other red flags or a worsening course.1
Stroke versus multiple sclerosis
Once a cause looks central, age, tempo, the company the vertigo keeps, and a few targeted tests usually separate the time-critical vascular event from the slower demyelinating one.
| Feature | Stroke | Multiple sclerosis |
|---|---|---|
| Onset | Sudden, maximal at onset | Subacute, over hours to days |
| Course | Monophasic, constant | Relapsing, evolves and recurs |
| Typical age | > 50 years | 20–40 years |
| Sex skew | Either | Female 2–3 : 1 |
| Risk factors | Vascular — hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, smoking | Autoimmune predisposition; prior demyelinating events |
| Nystagmus | Vertical/torsional, direction-changing, non-fatigable, fixation-resistant | Upbeat, downbeat or gaze-evoked; INO common |
| Associated signs | Hemiparesis, diplopia, dysarthria, Horner's, crossed sensory loss | Optic neuritis, INO, Lhermitte's sign, sensory symptoms |
| MRI | DWI-bright acute infarct in brainstem/cerebellum | T2/FLAIR plaques — periventricular, juxtacortical, infratentorial, cord |
| CSF | Usually normal | Oligoclonal bands in ~85–95% |
| Priority | Time-critical reperfusion / antithrombotic therapy | Steroids for the relapse, then disease-modifying therapy |
MRI and CSF seal the distinction: a DWI-bright posterior-fossa infarct points to stroke, while T2/FLAIR plaques in characteristic sites with oligoclonal bands point to MS under the 2017 McDonald criteria.6,7
Diagnostic pitfalls
- The false-negative MRI. Up to ~20% of small posterior-fossa infarcts are missed on DWI in the first 24–48 hours; persistent or progressive symptoms justify repeat imaging.4
- Isolated vertigo as stroke. Cerebellar and brainstem infarcts can present with vertigo and nothing else, and are repeatedly mislabelled as neuritis.5
- HINTS misuse. Applied outside continuous AVS, or by an untrained examiner, it misleads — and a normal head impulse in a truly vertiginous patient is a stroke red flag, not reassurance.
- MS mimics. An isolated brainstem plaque can imitate vestibular migraine, BPPV or PPPD, and a clinically isolated syndrome may not yet meet criteria — both need follow-up and repeat imaging.8
Future directions
Several developments aim to close the diagnostic gap in central vertigo: advanced MRI (diffusion-tensor and susceptibility-weighted imaging) for small or atypical lesions; blood biomarkers — serum neurofilament light chain in MS, and ischaemia markers in stroke — to support early triage;9 machine-learning analysis of videonystagmography and video head-impulse data; and tele-HINTS, delivering expert oculomotor assessment remotely to under-served settings.
Key points
- Decide central vs peripheral first; in AVS, HINTS is more sensitive than early MRI for stroke.
- Any one central feature — normal head impulse, direction-changing nystagmus, or skew — makes the pattern dangerous.
- Stroke is sudden, older, vascular, monophasic; MS is subacute, younger, autoimmune, relapsing.
- MRI (DWI vs T2/FLAIR plaques) and CSF oligoclonal bands separate stroke from MS.
- Beware the false-negative early MRI and the misuse of HINTS outside acute vestibular syndrome.