At the bedside

Differential diagnosis & HINTS

Two questions decide everything. First: is this central or peripheral? Then, if central: is it stroke or something slower? Both are answered mostly by the history and a careful oculomotor examination.

Central versus peripheral

The first fork is the highest-stakes one. A handful of features separate a benign peripheral vestibulopathy from a dangerous central lesion — no single one is decisive, but the pattern usually is.1

Bedside features: peripheral vs central
FeaturePeripheralCentral
NystagmusUnidirectional, horizontal-torsional; suppressed by fixationVertical / torsional / direction-changing; fixation does not suppress
Head impulse testAbnormal (catch-up saccade) on the affected sideOften normal — a red flag in acute vestibular syndrome
Skew deviationAbsentMay be present
GaitUnsteady but able to walkOften cannot stand or walk unaided
HearingMay be affected (e.g. labyrinthitis, Ménière’s)Usually spared — except AICA infarction
Other signsNoneDiplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, weakness, numbness, Horner’s

The HINTS interpreter

In a genuine acute vestibular syndrome, the three-step HINTS battery is more sensitive than early MRI for stroke.2,3 Set each finding below and read off the verdict. Remember the rule: any one central feature is enough to call the pattern dangerous.

HINTS interpreter

for a true acute vestibular syndrome
Head Impulse
Nystagmus
Test of Skew
✓ Peripheral
Reassuring (peripheral) pattern

Abnormal head impulse + unidirectional nystagmus + no skew is the benign peripheral triad, consistent with vestibular neuritis — but only when a true AVS is present and there are no other red flags.

Remember the danger mnemonic INFARCTImpulse Normal, Fast-phase Alternating, Refixation on Cover Test. HINTS only applies to a genuine acute vestibular syndrome with spontaneous nystagmus; outside that setting it can mislead.

The reassuring peripheral triad — abnormal head impulse, unidirectional nystagmus, no skew — is only valid when there is a true continuous AVS with spontaneous nystagmus. HINTS does not apply to episodic or positional vertigo, and a benign pattern never overrides other red flags or a worsening course.1

Stroke versus multiple sclerosis

Once a cause looks central, age, tempo, the company the vertigo keeps, and a few targeted tests usually separate the time-critical vascular event from the slower demyelinating one.

Stroke vs multiple sclerosis at a glance
FeatureStrokeMultiple sclerosis
OnsetSudden, maximal at onsetSubacute, over hours to days
CourseMonophasic, constantRelapsing, evolves and recurs
Typical age> 50 years20–40 years
Sex skewEitherFemale 2–3 : 1
Risk factorsVascular — hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidaemia, smokingAutoimmune predisposition; prior demyelinating events
NystagmusVertical/torsional, direction-changing, non-fatigable, fixation-resistantUpbeat, downbeat or gaze-evoked; INO common
Associated signsHemiparesis, diplopia, dysarthria, Horner's, crossed sensory lossOptic neuritis, INO, Lhermitte's sign, sensory symptoms
MRIDWI-bright acute infarct in brainstem/cerebellumT2/FLAIR plaques — periventricular, juxtacortical, infratentorial, cord
CSFUsually normalOligoclonal bands in ~85–95%
PriorityTime-critical reperfusion / antithrombotic therapySteroids for the relapse, then disease-modifying therapy

MRI and CSF seal the distinction: a DWI-bright posterior-fossa infarct points to stroke, while T2/FLAIR plaques in characteristic sites with oligoclonal bands point to MS under the 2017 McDonald criteria.6,7

Diagnostic pitfalls

  • The false-negative MRI. Up to ~20% of small posterior-fossa infarcts are missed on DWI in the first 24–48 hours; persistent or progressive symptoms justify repeat imaging.4
  • Isolated vertigo as stroke. Cerebellar and brainstem infarcts can present with vertigo and nothing else, and are repeatedly mislabelled as neuritis.5
  • HINTS misuse. Applied outside continuous AVS, or by an untrained examiner, it misleads — and a normal head impulse in a truly vertiginous patient is a stroke red flag, not reassurance.
  • MS mimics. An isolated brainstem plaque can imitate vestibular migraine, BPPV or PPPD, and a clinically isolated syndrome may not yet meet criteria — both need follow-up and repeat imaging.8

Future directions

Several developments aim to close the diagnostic gap in central vertigo: advanced MRI (diffusion-tensor and susceptibility-weighted imaging) for small or atypical lesions; blood biomarkers — serum neurofilament light chain in MS, and ischaemia markers in stroke — to support early triage;9 machine-learning analysis of videonystagmography and video head-impulse data; and tele-HINTS, delivering expert oculomotor assessment remotely to under-served settings.

Key points

  • Decide central vs peripheral first; in AVS, HINTS is more sensitive than early MRI for stroke.
  • Any one central feature — normal head impulse, direction-changing nystagmus, or skew — makes the pattern dangerous.
  • Stroke is sudden, older, vascular, monophasic; MS is subacute, younger, autoimmune, relapsing.
  • MRI (DWI vs T2/FLAIR plaques) and CSF oligoclonal bands separate stroke from MS.
  • Beware the false-negative early MRI and the misuse of HINTS outside acute vestibular syndrome.